If you're looking for a Loom alternative, the choice comes down to what you value more: Loom's convenience (instant links, analytics, team workspaces) or Capme's approach (free, private, instant downloads, no vendor lock-in).
Loom has 25 million users and owns the async video category. You record, get a link, paste it in Slack - done. That workflow is burned into thousands of teams.
Capme is the opposite bet: everything stays on your device. You open a browser tab, hit record, and download the file. No account. No upload wait. No monthly bill per person. As the best Loom alternative for privacy and cost, you control where the video lives - Google Drive, Dropbox, email attachment, whatever you already use.
This guide breaks down how Capme works as a Loom alternative - features, pricing, workflows, privacy - so you can figure out which tradeoffs make sense for your situation.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
How this Loom alternative stacks up
Here's how Capme compares to Loom across the features that matter for async video.
Capme
- Pricing (per user/month)$0 (Beta)
- Local-first privacy
- Instant download
- Branding (logos, backgrounds)
- Auto-scrolling teleprompter
- Aspect ratio options9:16, 1:1, 16:9
- Browser-based (no install)
- No watermarks
- Cloud hosting & sharing
- Video analytics
- Team workspaces
Loom
- Pricing (per user/month)$15 (Business)
- Local-first privacy
- Instant downloadUpload required
- Branding (logos, backgrounds)Paid only
- Auto-scrolling teleprompter
- Aspect ratio options16:9 only
- Browser-based (no install)Desktop app
- No watermarksPaid only
- Cloud hosting & sharing
- Video analytics
- Team workspaces
The table above shows what each tool can do. But when evaluating screen recording software, checkmarks only tell you so much. The real question isn't "which has more features?" - it's "which architecture matches how your team actually works?"
Loom is fundamentally a cloud hosting platform that happens to include a recorder. Capme is fundamentally a privacy-first recorder that happens to produce files you can host anywhere. That philosophical difference ripples through every workflow decision you'll make, from how fast you can share a video to what happens when your subscription ends.
The sections below explain what these architectural differences actually mean in practice. Understanding the design philosophy behind each tool will clarify which one fits your workflow.
Understanding the Core Differences
What makes Capme a different kind of Loom alternative
When evaluating any Loom alternative, the question isn't just feature checklists - it's how each tool actually works and what that means for your workflow.
Architecture: Cloud vs Local-First
Loom's Cloud Architecture: When you record with Loom, your video uploads to their AWS infrastructure immediately. The file goes through processing: thumbnails, AI transcription, chapter extraction, multiple quality versions for adaptive streaming. Usually takes 30 seconds to a few minutes depending on length. You get a shareable link while that happens in the background.
What you get: Instant shareable links. Automatic backup. CDN delivery so viewers worldwide get fast playback. Access from any device. Loom handles storage and bandwidth - you just paste links in Slack or email.
What you give up: Your content passes through Loom's servers. You're dependent on their uptime and processing speed. Storage caps apply (5 hours on free, unlimited on paid). Your videos live in Loom's infrastructure - if you cancel, you lose access unless you export everything first.
Capme's Local-First Architecture: When you record with Capme, everything happens in your browser. No uploads during recording. When you hit stop, you get a video file saved to your Downloads folder instantly. No processing, no waiting, no server round-trip.
What you get: Complete privacy (videos never touch our servers). Instant availability (no upload wait). Unlimited recording time (only constrained by your device storage). You own the files - share them anywhere, store them wherever you want. Works offline after initial page load.
What you handle yourself: You manage sharing (upload to Google Drive / Dropbox / your own hosting). You manage storage (videos live on your device or wherever you put them). No built-in analytics - if you need view tracking, host on a platform that provides it.
Speed: Instant vs Upload-Dependent
Capme: Hit stop, video file appears in Downloads instantly. Total time from "stop recording" to "video ready to use": 0-2 seconds. You can immediately drag that file into Slack, attach to email, upload to Google Drive, or share via your company's file system. The video is yours, immediately, as a standard MP4/WEBM file.
Loom: Hit stop, video uploads to Loom's servers (speed depends on file size and your internet connection). While uploading, Loom processes the video: generates thumbnails, creates multiple quality versions, transcribes audio if you have AI features enabled. Total time from "stop recording" to "video ready to share": 30 seconds to 5 minutes depending on length and connection speed. You get a link while this happens, but the video might not be viewable yet.
Sharing: File-Based vs Link-Based
With Loom: You get a link (e.g., loom.com/share/abc123). Paste it in Slack, email, Notion - works everywhere. Recipient clicks, video plays in browser with Loom's player. You can see who watched, for how long, which parts they rewatched. You can revoke access anytime by deleting the video.
With Capme: You get a file. Upload it to Google Drive, share the Drive link. Or upload to Dropbox, share Dropbox link. Or attach directly to email if it's small enough. Or upload to your company SharePoint. Or host on YouTube/Vimeo if you want public sharing. Recipient watches via whatever platform you chose.
Browser Compatibility & Installation
Capme browser support: Works in Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc, and Safari. Requires HTTPS (which capme.app provides) or localhost for camera/microphone access - this is a browser security requirement, not Capme-specific. Picture-in-Picture controls work in Chromium browsers (Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc). Safari has core functionality but limited Picture-in-Picture support.
Loom requirements: Desktop app available for Windows, Mac, Linux. Browser extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari. The desktop app generally performs better than the extension because it has direct system access. Mobile apps available for iOS and Android (Capme currently has no mobile support).
Recording Quality & Performance
Both platforms can record up to 1080p video at 30fps, which is standard for screen recordings. The encoding process is where they differ.
Loom uses cloud-based transcoding. Your recording uploads, then their servers optimize it and generate multiple bitrate versions (adaptive streaming) so viewers on slow connections still get smooth playback. The desktop app typically produces slightly better quality than the browser extension because it has direct system access.
Capme uses your device's hardware encoder - VP8, VP9, or H.264 depending on which browser you're using. Modern laptops with dedicated GPUs handle this with minimal performance hit. Older machines without hardware acceleration might show higher CPU usage. The file you download is the raw encoded output - no re-encoding, no quality degradation from cloud processing. Available quality settings: 480p, 720p, or 1080p.
Speed & Workflow Efficiency
Time from Record to Share:
- →Loom: Stop recording → Wait for upload (10s-2min depending on file size) → Link ready → Paste link in Slack/email
- →Capme: Stop recording → Instant download OR use native share button to send directly to Slack/Drive/Messages → File is in recipient's hands
Branding & Setup Persistence:
Capme burns branding into the video during recording - logos, backgrounds, and lower thirds (name/title overlays) are baked in as you capture. Upload your logo once, pick a background, add your title - Capme remembers everything locally. Next time you open Studio, all your settings are ready. Device selection (camera/mic), quality settings (480p/720p/1080p), and branding preferences persist across sessions.
Loom applies branding during cloud post-processing (paid plans only). You configure workspace settings once, then they're applied automatically when videos upload. Free plan adds Loom watermarks to every video.
Integrations & Workflow Fit
Loom plays nicely with tools that expect a URL. Paste a Loom link into Slack, Notion, Confluence, or Jira and you usually get a rich preview. You can also set link permissions (workspace only, anyone with link, password on some plans) and track views on paid tiers.
Capme produces a file that you host wherever you already work - Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, or your own S3 bucket. In Chromium browsers, the native share button can hand off directly to Slack or Drive without you hunting for the upload dialog. For embeds, use your host's share URL (for example, an unlisted YouTube link) and drop it in the same places you would paste a Loom link.
Accessibility & Captions
Loom can auto generate transcripts and captions on paid plans, which helps with searchability and accessibility. You can skim text to jump to a moment and share time stamped links. Verify exact availability per plan before you rely on it for compliance reports.
Capme focuses on capture, not hosting. Accessibility features depend on where you upload the file. YouTube and Vimeo can auto caption. Google Drive previews do not add captions automatically. For internal docs, you can attach a transcript file generated by your preferred tool, or paste a short summary below the embed.
Editing Pipeline & Post Production
Loom offers basic browser editing like trim and cut, then re encodes in the cloud. Downloads are MP4, which drop into any editor if you need more polish. For most async updates, the built in tools are enough.
Capme gives you the original recording immediately as WebM or MP4 (browser dependent). For quick trims, use lightweight editors already on most machines (Clipchamp on Windows, QuickTime or iMovie on macOS). For heavier edits, bring the file into your usual NLE. Because Capme bakes branding during capture, you often skip post entirely.
Pricing Comparison
Cost analysis for teams of different sizes
Capme is currently free during beta (all features, unlimited recording). Loom has a free tier (5 min max, watermarks, 25 videos) and paid plans starting at $15/user/month (Business plan, billed annually).
Capme
Currently Free (Beta)
per user, per month (as of October 2025)
- Unlimited recording time
- All features included
- Automatic branding
- Built-in teleprompter
- No watermarks ever
- Complete local privacy
Loom Business
Paid Plan
per user, per month (billed annually)
- Unlimited recording time
- Cloud hosting & sharing
- Video analytics
- Team workspaces
- Custom branding
- Optional Business + AI upgrade at $20/user/month (annual) for AI editing & automation
- Free tier: 5 min limit, watermarks
The pricing cards above show the direct costs. Business decisions require evaluating total cost of ownership - the full picture of what you're actually paying for over time.
With Loom, you're buying convenience: instant shareable links, cloud hosting you don't manage, analytics baked in, team workspaces. The $15/user/month pays for infrastructure and UX polish. With Capme, you're getting the recorder for free during beta, but you'll use infrastructure you already pay for - Google Drive, Dropbox, or your own hosting. Neither approach is inherently better; they're optimized for different constraints.
Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
When evaluating video recording tools, the sticker price is just the beginning. Factors that impact your total cost include infrastructure, training time, storage, and vendor dependencies.
Loom's Pricing Structure Explained:
Loom's free tier limits you to 25 videos with 5-minute maximum length, watermarked output, and basic features. This works for personal use or testing, but teams quickly outgrow it.
The Business plan at $15/user/month (billed annually) unlocks unlimited recording, removes Loom branding, adds basic waveform editing, provides video analytics, and includes team workspaces. For a 10-person team, that's $1,800 annually. Scale to 50 users and you're at $9,000/year.
Need AI-assisted editing? Business + AI runs $20/user/month (annual billing) and layers on auto video enhancements, advanced editing, video-to-text automation, and meeting recap features.
Hidden costs include training time (learning Loom's ecosystem), storage management (though unlimited on paid plans), and potential vendor lock-in - if you cancel, accessing archived videos requires maintaining your subscription.
Capme's Cost Structure:
Currently free during beta. When pricing is introduced, the local-first architecture means there are no storage costs, no bandwidth fees, and no per-seat limitations for basic recording features.
Your actual costs with Capme depend on where you host shared videos. If you already pay for Google Workspace, Dropbox Business, or Office 365, you're using existing infrastructure. Uploading to YouTube (free) or Vimeo (from $7/month for teams) are other options.
The trade-off is setup complexity - you need a sharing workflow instead of automatic Loom links. For teams already using cloud storage, this is minimal friction. For those expecting turnkey simplicity, it's an adjustment.
Calculate Your Costs
Use this calculator to estimate your annual Loom costs based on team size. Adjust the monthly price if you're on a different plan or considering an upgrade.
For a 10-person team on Loom Business, annual costs reach $1,800. A 50-person team pays $9,000 annually. These figures represent significant budget considerations for startups and small businesses.
Async video communication delivers clear ROI through reduced meeting time and productivity gains. The decision centers on whether Loom's infrastructure - cloud hosting, instant shareable links, built-in analytics - justifies the per-seat cost over a free alternative like Capme where you handle file sharing yourself.
Privacy & Security
Understanding data handling in each platform
Understanding where video data lives is critical for teams with strict compliance requirements. Capme and Loom take fundamentally different approaches to privacy.
Capme: Local-First Privacy
- No cloud uploads:All recording and processing happens in your browser
- Your device only:Videos stay on your machine until you explicitly share them
- No data collection:We never see your footage, branding assets, or scripts
- GDPR/CCPA posture:We don't collect your video content or branding assets; compliance for storage and sharing depends on your chosen provider and internal policies
- Perfect for sensitive content:Financial, healthcare, legal, internal communications
Loom: Cloud-Based Hosting
- Automatic uploads:All recordings upload to Loom's servers for processing
- Cloud storage required:Videos hosted on Loom infrastructure
- Data processing:Content analyzed for transcription, thumbnails, insights
- Benefit:Easy sharing with generated links, built-in viewer analytics
- Trade-off:Your content passes through third-party servers
Privacy and security are workflow constraints that either enable or block what your team can do with video. Recording quarterly board updates with unreleased earnings data on a cloud platform creates compliance violations. Support teams helping customers troubleshoot need infrastructure that enables fast sharing without file management overhead.
Both platforms can be secure in their contexts. The critical decision is: does your data need to stay on your devices, or are you comfortable with managed cloud infrastructure? The sections below explain who benefits from each model and how they fit existing infrastructure.
🏥Local-first benefits
- • Privacy-first individuals and executives who don't want drafts on third-party servers
- • Teams with strict client confidentiality requirements
- • CEOs and management sharing internal strategy or pre-announcement materials
- • Security-conscious organizations with existing storage controls and endpoint DLP
🔧Infrastructure integration
- • SharePoint/OneDrive: keep everything inside Microsoft 365 with org-wide permissions
- • Google Drive: shared drives with link policies for internal distribution
- • Dropbox Business: team folders with audit trails
- • S3 or on-prem NAS: private buckets, lifecycle rules, and VPC-only access
Compliance, Retention, and Ownership
Capme (local-first): Because recordings never leave your device unless you share them, retention is your call. Store files in Google Drive, SharePoint, S3, or an on-prem server and apply the same retention policy you already use for docs. There are no vendor deletion windows to track and no exports to request if you close an account. The tradeoff is responsibility - you own backups, access controls, and lifecycle rules.
Loom (cloud-first): Retention lives in workspace settings and plan limits. You can typically set who can view, whether links expire, and when content is removed. If you plan to switch tools, export before cancellation to avoid content loss. For regulated teams, review the vendor's DPA, data flow diagrams, and deletion SLAs so Legal and Security sign off.
Threat Model: Cloud vs Endpoint
💻Local-first risks (Capme)
- • Device loss or theft exposing local files
- • Ad-hoc sharing to personal drives or email
- • No central revocation if a file link escapes
Mitigate with full-disk encryption, MDM, endpoint DLP, and org-owned storage with least-privilege permissions.
☁️Cloud-first risks (Loom)
- • Third-party breach risk and supply-chain exposure
- • Link leakage via "anyone with the link" settings
- • Misconfigured org-level permissions or groups
Mitigate with SSO, strict link policies, domain restrictions, periodic audits, and auto-expiring links where available.
Data Residency and Transfers
Capme: Data residency follows where you decide to store videos. For EU-only processing, keep recordings in EU-based Drive/SharePoint/S3 buckets and restrict cross-region replication. Capme does not upload by default, so you stay within your chosen boundary.
Loom: Review available data residency options and subprocessors in the vendor's Trust Center and DPA. Document regional requirements in writing before deployment if regional segregation is mandatory.
Encryption and Transport
Capme: Recording and rendering happen in your browser. Nothing is transmitted until you upload or share the file. Transport security and encryption at rest depend on the destination you choose. Use HTTPS for uploads and enforce at-rest encryption on your storage.
Loom: Videos are encrypted with TLS in transit and at rest, with details documented in security materials. Verify key management practices, access to audit logs, and incident response commitments during vendor evaluation.
When to Choose Each Tool
Matching platform to your workflow
Neither Capme nor Loom is universally "better" - they excel in different scenarios. Each tool addresses specific use cases.
The decision framework below breaks down by constraint type. Teams comparing screen recording tools should identify their primary bottleneck rather than comparing feature lists. Budget limitations, privacy requirements, team collaboration needs, and sharing speed all point toward different solutions.
Choose Capme when:
Budget is a priority
Need professional video recording without monthly per-user costs eating into your budget.
Privacy is non-negotiable
Recording sensitive content that must stay on your devices without third-party server uploads.
Speed matters
Need to record and download instantly without waiting for uploads or processing.
Branding is essential
Want automatic logo/background overlays on every recording without paying for premium.
Choose Loom when:
Team collaboration
Need shared workspaces where teams can organize, comment, and manage videos together.
Analytics matter
Want to track who watched your videos, for how long, and which parts they rewatched.
Cloud hosting needed
Prefer Loom to host videos so you can share simple links instead of managing files.
Integration required
Need deep integrations with Slack, Notion, Google Workspace, or other team tools.
The comparison above provides the high-level decision framework. Teams need to evaluate specific scenarios - recording 50 videos per week for customer support and determining if $9,000/year is justified, rather than abstract feature comparisons.
Most teams don't fit into one category exclusively. You might need privacy for internal strategy videos but want Loom's speed for customer support. Hybrid approaches work well - use Capme where privacy or cost matters, use Loom where collaboration and analytics matter.
Choose based on your primary constraint:
• Budget-constrained: Capme (currently free)
• Time-constrained: Loom (fastest link sharing)
• Privacy-constrained: Capme (local-first)
• Team-coordination-constrained: Loom (built-in workspaces)
Three real scenarios illustrate how each tool performs in practice - customer support teams, startup founders, and remote engineering teams. These examples are based on actual usage patterns and the friction points teams encounter.
Pay attention to the volume numbers (videos per week, team size, annual costs). These metrics determine which tool delivers better value for each specific scenario.
Real-World Scenario Comparisons
📊Scenario 1: Customer Support Team (20 agents)
Need: Quick screen recordings showing customers how to use features, troubleshoot issues, or navigate complex workflows. Typical video length: 2-5 minutes. Volume: 50-100 videos/week.
Loom advantage: Support agents can record, get an instant link, and paste it into the support ticket within seconds. No file management overhead. Videos automatically organize in workspace. Team lead can review common issues via Loom's folder structure.
Capme consideration: Would require agents to record → download → upload to shared drive → paste drive link. Adds 30-60 seconds per video. Over 100 videos/week, that's 50-100 minutes of overhead. However, if privacy regulations prohibit cloud storage of customer data (even screen recordings), Capme becomes necessary despite workflow friction.
💼Scenario 2: Startup Founder Recording Investor Updates
Need: Monthly video updates to investors showing metrics, product progress, and strategic decisions. Length: 10-15 minutes. Volume: 1-2 videos/month. Audience: 15 investors + advisors.
Capme advantage: Record once, get instant file, upload to private YouTube (unlisted) or Vimeo. Full control over hosting. Built-in teleprompter helps nail the script without retakes. Automatic branding ensures professional appearance. Zero recurring costs.
Loom consideration: Would work fine but costs $15/month for the founder's account (assuming Business plan for custom branding). Over a year, that's $180 for producing ~12-24 videos. Capme's teleprompter feature is actually superior to Loom's offering (Loom has none).
🏢Scenario 3: Remote Team Async Standups (50 employees)
Need: Daily or weekly video updates from team members replacing synchronous standup meetings. Length: 1-3 minutes. Volume: 50 videos/day if daily, 250/week if weekly. Audience: internal team only.
Loom advantage: Team workspace makes organization trivial. Everyone posts their Loom link to a Slack channel. Videos auto-expire after 90 days (cleanup happens automatically on Enterprise plan). Analytics show who's actually watching standup videos. Cost: $750/month ($9,000/year) for the Business plan.
Capme consideration: Each person records → uploads to Google Drive shared folder → posts link. More friction, but team is already on Google Workspace ($12/user/month = $7,200/year, which they're paying anyway). Adding Loom on top means $16,200/year total SaaS cost vs. $7,200/year using existing infrastructure.
How to Switch from Loom to Capme
Step-by-step migration guide
Switching from Loom to Capme takes about 30 minutes. The complete process is outlined below.
The biggest mental shift isn't technical - it's moving from "videos live in Loom's cloud" to "videos are files I control." Once you have a file-sharing workflow documented (Google Drive, Dropbox, or whatever you already use), the transition is straightforward. Most teams finish the migration during a single team meeting.
If you're currently on Loom and considering the switch, the steps below assume you want to preserve your existing video library and establish new recording workflows. If you're starting fresh (no existing Loom videos to migrate), skip to step 2.
Download your existing Loom videos
Export any videos you want to keep from Loom before canceling your subscription. Loom allows downloads from the video settings menu. Store them in Google Drive, Dropbox, or your preferred location.
Set up your branding in Capme
Upload your logo, choose backgrounds, and configure lower thirds once. Capme remembers these settings locally for every future recording. Go to Capme Studio to configure.
Create your first recording
Choose your capture mode (webcam, screen, or mixed), hit record, and test the workflow. No signups, no installs required.
Set up your file sharing workflow
Since Capme doesn't host videos, choose how you'll share: Google Drive, Dropbox, Slack file uploads, email attachments, or your own hosting. Document this for your team.
Roll out to your team
Share the Capme Studio link with your team. Everyone can set up their own branding preferences locally - no central admin required. Run a quick training session showing the new file-based workflow.
Five steps, 30 minutes total, and you're operational. The most challenging aspect is typically step 4 (deciding where videos will live) because it requires team alignment - whether to use existing Google Drive, create a dedicated Dropbox folder, or upload to unlisted YouTube for easy embeds. Select the option that fits your existing infrastructure and document the decision.
Common migration concern: "What if we need to go back to Loom?" You can. Capme produces standard video files (MP4/WebM) that work with any tool. If you try Capme and decide Loom's workflow is worth the cost, your videos aren't locked into a proprietary format. Unlike platform migrations that require exports and conversions, switching between Loom and Capme in either direction is friction-free.
The Actual Recommendation
Choose based on your constraints, not feature lists
After comparing features, pricing, privacy models, and workflows, the decision centers on which tool's tradeoffs match your primary constraint. The breakdown below clarifies when to choose each platform.
🟦Choose Loom if:
- •You need instant link sharing with no file management overhead
- •Your team already lives in Loom and switching would cause workflow disruption
- •You need view analytics and engagement tracking
- •Budget isn't a constraint and you value "just works" simplicity
- •You need workspace organization with folders and permissions
🟥Choose Capme if:
- •Privacy and local-first architecture are non-negotiable requirements
- •You're in a regulated industry (finance, healthcare, legal) with strict data policies
- •Budget is tight and paying $15/user/month isn't realistic
- •You want instant video files without upload wait times
- •You need a teleprompter for scripted recording
- •You're producing creator content (YouTube, courses) and need production features
The reality: High-velocity teams (customer support, sales, remote standups) without budget constraints benefit significantly from Loom's UX advantage. The 30-60 seconds saved per video compounds quickly. For teams where privacy, cost, or compliance is the constraint, Capme eliminates those problems entirely.
Your decision should focus on your primary constraint: Speed? Privacy? Cost? Compliance? Identifying which factor matters most leads to the right choice for your specific situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Capme vs Loom
Is Capme really free right now?
Yes. Capme is currently in beta and completely free to use with all features - unlimited recording, branding, teleprompter. Future pricing will be announced as we develop the product further.
What happens to my Loom videos if I switch?
Download any videos you want to keep before canceling Loom. Loom allows exports from video settings. Store them locally or in your preferred cloud storage (Google Drive, Dropbox, etc.).
Does Capme work on mobile devices?
Capme is currently optimized for desktop/laptop browsers (Chrome, Edge, Safari, Brave). Mobile recording support is on the roadmap.
Can I share Capme videos as easily as Loom links?
Capme exports video files directly. Share them via Google Drive, Dropbox, Slack, email, or any file-sharing method your team already uses. You control where videos live.
Does Capme have analytics and view tracking?
No, Capme doesn't track who watches your videos (privacy-first approach). If you need analytics, host videos on platforms like YouTube, Vimeo, or Wistia which provide their own analytics.
Is Capme really as easy to use as Loom?
Yes. Open Capme Studio in your browser, choose your capture mode, hit record. No installs, no signups. Branding settings save locally so setup is even faster than Loom after the first time.
What's the best free alternative to Loom?
Capme is the best free alternative to Loom if you value privacy, zero per-seat costs, and instant downloads with no upload wait times. While Loom excels at shareable links and team workspaces, Capme offers unlimited recording with automatic branding, teleprompter, and complete local-first privacy - all at zero cost during the beta period. Other Loom alternatives include OBS Studio (free but complex) and ScreenPal (freemium with watermarks).
Is Capme better than Loom for privacy?
Yes, if local-first privacy is your priority. Capme records entirely in your browser with zero server uploads during capture - your videos never touch external servers unless you choose to upload them. Loom uploads all recordings to their AWS infrastructure by default. For teams with strict compliance requirements or data residency mandates, Capme's architecture eliminates an entire category of compliance risk.
How does Capme vs Loom pricing compare long-term?
Currently, Capme is free during beta (all features, unlimited recording). Loom costs $15/user/month (Business plan, annual billing). For a 10-person team, that's $1,800/year. While Capme will introduce pricing in the future, the local-first model typically offers better economics at scale since there are no cloud storage or bandwidth costs to pass on. Teams should factor in their existing file storage costs (Google Drive, Dropbox) when comparing total cost of ownership.