35% overhead added for taxes, benefits & employer costs
Replace status updates, announcements, and one-way meetings with async video. Your team watches at 2x speed on their schedule - everyone saves time.
When you multiply savings across your whole organization, the numbers get serious. Here's the research behind our estimate.
That's the annual cost of unnecessary meetings across US companies
Doodle State of MeetingsExecutives say up to a third of their company's meetings don't need real-time attendance
Harvard Business ReviewMeeting hours have doubled since 2020. Async can reverse the trend.
Microsoft Work Trend IndexNot every meeting needs to go. But all-hands, training sessions, and status syncs? Those work just as well as async video - maybe better.
We use a conservative 28% estimate based on teams that have gone async-first.
See how async works for teamsIf 3+ of these sound familiar, your meeting culture is costing more than just money.
Employees have less than 4 hours of focus time daily
"Let's schedule a follow-up to discuss this further"
Most attendees are silent observers, not contributors
The only quiet time is when no one else is online
But everyone knows it's not actually a joke
Weekly syncs that haven't been useful in months
When recording a quick update is faster than scheduling a call, people stop defaulting to meetings. That's the shift.
When meetings become videos, your calendar opens up. Here's how companies are getting those hours back.
Questions about calculating your organization's meeting costs and building a case for async.
Set your headcount, average salary, and weekly hours spent in meetings per employee. The defaults are based on industry averages if you're not sure.
The calculator shows your total annual meeting spend using fully-loaded costs. It also estimates potential savings if you shifted a portion of meetings to async.
Download the results and share them with leadership. These numbers make async video a much easier sell when the CFO can see the alternative.